Monday, August 24, 2015

Religious Sect Vs new Religion = Risk Scale which one stronger


DID THE BRITISH CREATE WAHHABISM? • Ethiopian News Forum
Ethiopian News, Current Affairs and Opinion Forum

DID THE BRITISH CREATE WAHHABISM?

Posted by Zmeselo on 15 Oct 2012, 06:28

Memoirs Of Mr. Hempher, The British Spy To The Middle East
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Confessions of a British Spy and British Enmity Against Islam
Author(s) M. Sıddık Gümüş

Publisher Hakikat Kitabevi
Publication date 2001

Memoirs Of Mr. Hempher, The British Spy To The Middle East or Confessions of a British Spy is a document purporting to be the account by an 18th century British agent, Hempher, of his instrumental role in founding the conservative Islamic reform movement of Wahhabism.
The book has been denounced by some Muslims and called an "imaginary fictional narrative, coined deliberately to discredit" Muhammad ibn Abd-al-Wahhab "and his followers by the British."[1] In the West it is considered a forgery and has been described as "an Anglophobic variation on `The Protocols of the Elders of Zion`”[2]


In the book's story, a British spy named Hempher, working in the early 1700s, disguises himself as a Muslim and infiltrates the Ottoman Empire with the goal of weakening it to destroy Islam once and for all. He tells his readers: "when the unity of Muslims is broken and the common sympathy among them is impaired, their forces will be dissolved and thus we shall easily destroy them... We, the English people, have to make mischief and arouse schism in all our colonies in order that we may live in welfare and luxury."[3]
Hempher intends ultimately to weaken Muslim morals by promoting "alcohol and fornication," but his first step is to promote innovation and disorder in Islam by creating Wahhabism, which is to gain credibility by being on the surface morally strict. For this purpose, he enlists "a gullible, hotheaded young Iraqi in Basra named Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab".[4] Hempher corrupts and flatters Wahhab until the man is willing to found his own sect.
In the story, Hempher is one of 5,000 British agents with the assignment of weakening Muslims, which the British government plans to increase to 100,000 by the end of the 18th century. Hempher writes, "when we reach this number we shall have brought all Muslims under our sway" and Islam will be rendered "into a miserable state from which it will never recover again."[3]

Controversy

In the West the "Memoirs" have been described as "probably the labor of a Sunni Muslim author whose intent is to present Muslims as both too holy and too weak to organize anything as destructive as Wahhabism."[2] Bernard Haykel of Harvard's Olin Institute describes the document as an anti-Wahhabi forgery, "probably fabricated by one Ayyub Sabri Pasha"[5], despite which the document has significant currency in the Middle East, according to Haykel[5]. Sabri Pasha was an Ottoman writer who studied a the naval academy, and earned the rank of naval officer, serving for a time in the Hijaz and Yemen. He wrote historical works on the Saudi dynasty[6] and died in 1890[7]. In "The Beginning and Spread of Wahhabism", he recounts the story of Abdul Wahhab's association with Hempher the British Spy, and their plot to create a new religion.[8]
A debunking by a Muslim author (Abul Haarith) points out that no evidence of Hempher can be found in computer database searches of libraries and rare books, and that facts and incidents related in the book do not make sense. The "Memoirs" claim Hempher travelled to Basra in 1712 and there met Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab, a student who spoke Turkish, Persian and Arabic. In fact, ibn Abdul Wahhab would have been 9-10 years old and living in his native region of Najd at that time, since he was born in 1115H (1703/1704CE) and did not leave Najd, except for hajj, to "travel to seek knowledge until 1722".[1] Abul Haarith also notes that the book has Hempher boasting that the British Empire "was so vast it was said that the sun did not set within its boundaries," when in fact this claim was not, and could not, have been made until about a century later.[1]
The actual birth date of Muhammad Ibn Abd-Alwahab is disputed however. The famous Islamic Scholar and historian Ahmad Zayni Dahlan Al-Makkiyy claims, in his book Fitnat ul Wahhabiyah, that Ibn Abd-Alwahhab was born in the year 1111H or 1699, making him 14 at the time of his supposed metting with Hempher, and not 9 years old [9] [10].
Other Wahhabi complaints about the memoir are that it would have been unlikely for the British to have supported and helped bin Abdul Wahhab as "there was no British presence in that region in the mid-18th century", and that there are only two explicit mentions of dates (1710CE and 1730CE) in a work purportedly based on a diary, which generally have dated entries.[7]
[edit]See also

War against Islam#Confessions of a British Spy
[edit]References

^ a b c Who is Hampher (hempher)? scroll down to "Humphrey’s ‘Memoirs’" by Abul Haarith
^ a b Caught in the Crossfire by George Packer, May 17, 2004
^ a b HizmetBooks
^ The Saga of "Hempher," Purported British Spy, an extract from The Hidden Hand: Middle East Fears of Conspiracy, pp. 211-12. Daniel Pipes, December 1996
^ a b » Anti-Wahhabism: a footnote Middle East Strategy at Harvard
^ » Viquipèdia - Ayyub Sabri Pasha
^ a b Evidence That Hempher's Diaries Are a Forgery Abu.Iyaad | wahhabis.com| 20 August 2011
^ » The Beginning and Spread of Wahhabism www.sufi.it
^ Fitnat-ul-Wahhabiyah, Ahmad Zayni Dahlan Al-Makkiyy
^ http://www.islamicity.com/PrayerTimes/h ... artner.htm




Memoirs Of Hempher

PREFACE

Memoirs Of Hempher, The British Spy To The Middle East is the title of a document that was published in series (episodes) in the German paper Spiegel and later on in a prominent French paper. A Lebanese doctor translated the document to the Arabic language and from there on it was translated to English and other languages. Waqf Ikhlas publications put out and circulated the document in English in hard copy and electronically under the title: Confessions of a British spy and British enmity against Islam. This document reveals the true background of the Wahhabi movement which was innovated by Mohammad bin abdul Wahhab and explains the numerous falsehood they spread in the name of Islam and exposes their role of enmity towards the religion of Islam and towards prophet Mohammad and towards Muslims at large. No wonder the Wahhabis today stand as the backbone of terrorism allowing and financing and planning shedding the blood of Muslims and other innocent people. Their well known history of terrorism as documented in Fitnatul Wahhabiyyah by the mufti of Makkah, Sheikh Ahmad Zayni Dahlan, and their current assassinations and contravention is due to their ill belief that all are blasphemers save themselves. May Allah protect our nation from their evils.






Memoirs Of Hempher- Our Great Britain is very vast. The sun rises over its seas, and sets, again, below its seas. Our State is relatively weak yet in its colonies in India, China and Middle East.

2 In the Hijree year 1122, C.E. 1710, the Minister of Colonies sent me to Egypt, Iraq, Hidjaz and Istanbul to act as a spy and to obtain information necessary and sufficient for the breaking up of Muslims.

3 My friends had returned to London before I did and they had already received new commands from the Ministry. I, too, was given new commands upon returning. Unfortunately, only six of us were back.

4 When I arrived in Basra, I settled in a mosque. The imaam of the mosque was a Sunnite person of Arabic origin named Shaikh 'Umar Taaee. When I met him I began to chat with him.

5 It was on one of those days when Muhammad of Najd and I had become very intimate friends that I received a message from London ordering me to leave for the cities of Kerbelaa and Najaf, the two most popular Shiite centers of knowledge and spirituality. So I had to put an end to my company with Muhammad of Najd and leave Basra.

6 I stayed in Baghdad for a time. Then, receiving the message ordering me to return to London, I left. In London, I talked with the secretary and some officials of the Ministry.

7 Having enjoyed the first secret, I was looking forward to knowing the second secret. Eventually one day the secretary explained the second secret he had promised.






Memoirs Of Hempher

Re: DID THE BRITISH CREATE WAHHABISM?

Posted by Zmeselo on 15 Oct 2012, 06:37

http://www.google.se/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=h ... UFXKNRuBgw

Re: DID THE BRITISH CREATE WAHHABISM?

Posted by Conformist on 15 Oct 2012, 11:48

Apologists have argued the Memoirs Of Mr. Hempher is a fabrication, but a careful examination of the text shows this is nothing but a British blackops to divide and weaken Islam.

The reason actually had to do with question of Palestine, and the control of the Islamic holy sites. The Al Saud family are the blood relatives of the Donmeh Jews of Turkey, the Donmeh were descended from the false messiah Shabbati Zevi, who later converted to Islam.

The Al Sauds were descended from a Donmeh Jew from Basra, who used to be a sucessful businessman there. He married an Arab Bedouin woman, then he developed a cover story about how he was an Arab who immigrated from the Hijaz, then after building up a powerful family using the system of polygamy, he returned to Arabia and his family massacred the rightful rulers and became the Al Saud family.

Then with the help of british operatives the Al Sauds formed an alliance with the Wahhabis, otherwise no one in Arabia would have accepted them as the rightful rulers. The men who had the lineal right to rule Arabia are the Hasemites of Jordan.

The Donmeh of Turkey were the ones who were involved in the transfer of Jerusalem to British hands in 1915, making a success of the Balfour declaration, and the later paving the way for the Zionist conquest of Palestine. The Young Turks, the most prominent of whom was Ataturk, were all Donmeh Jews.

It is an ugly story, it takes a strong stomach to assimilate it.

Re: DID THE BRITISH CREATE WAHHABISM?

Posted by revolutions on 15 Oct 2012, 12:10


Interesting read.... thanks for sharing.

Re: DID THE BRITISH CREATE WAHHABISM?

Posted by Conformist on 15 Oct 2012, 14:28

There is more to read for those interested,

There is a book by Arthur Koestler titled The Thirteenth Tribe

http://www.fantompowa.info/koestlerindex.htm

It provides evidence to show the Zionist Jews are not Jews at all, they are a Turco-Mongol tribe known as the Khazars, who converted to Judaism wholesale,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khazars#Co ... to_Judaism

There is nothing Semitic or Jewish about the Zionists. As there is nothing Arab about the Al Sauds.

Re: DID THE BRITISH CREATE WAHHABISM?

Posted by Zmeselo on 16 Oct 2012, 05:14

Comformist,

when I think about this crazy and unbelievable issue, what surprises me more than the actual fact, is their ability to cover it up. I mean if the world population knew what/who these people are, we would see huge changes happening around the world. The other thing we must not loose sight of is the fact that the majority of the ashkenazi, eventhough not Abrahams children, are innocent of crimes against humanity. It´s the international jew, who´s the problem. Even jews were their victims in WWII. I believe the partial solution to this is for the jews of the world to wake up and point their fingers towards their own instead of shouting "anti-semitism" for every criticizm they hear about banksters and political husslers in their midst. If they don´t clean house and come clean, what happened to them in WWII, will happen again. They should apprehend the Rothchilds and the Rockefellers amongst them, leave palestine to the palestinians and make amends in that way!

Re: DID THE BRITISH CREATE WAHHABISM?

Posted by Conformist on 16 Oct 2012, 11:43

Dear Z,

You raised some interesting points,

1. The cover up.

The cover up is huge, despite the fact that more and more people are awakening today. The technique is the old carrot and stick method.

If you obey them you get the carrot, in the form of aid, jobs, trade opportunities and so on.

If you resist you get the stick like the destruction of Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and so on.

All world political and business leaders know who rules the globe behind the scenes, but they are so terrified of the power of this mysterious force, they betray the people to save themselves.

2. The majority of the world population can't know, because it is not interested in politics or the intricacies of how the complex money system works. But the few who know are not strong enough to make a change except opt out of this evil system. Many men have said it the past, "only if the people knew." But the people don't have the inclination to know.

3. The Jewish masses themselves have been the greatest victims, they have done nothing to deserve this, but the power hungry men are hiding behind the Jews, using them as their shields.

4. Hitler's frustration was caused by the international bankers destroying Germany while hiding behind the Jewish label. If you look at the following 1933 headline, you will see they declared war against Germany first, that was in 1933. Hitler was only reacting to that.

http://www.whale.to/b/Judea-Declares-War-On-Germany.jpg

Then you had the Weimar Republic which caused the torment of the people of Germany, if you research who was behind that horrible regime, you will not be surprised by the backlash during the Nazi regime.

5. Today most of the world has been conquered psychologically. In Africa the last independent regime was Libya, and it is now gone, Eritrea too is refusing to submit, but I don't know how long it can endure. Other than that the entire African continent is theirs now. They have a death grip on Europe and Russia. Now China to is under their strong influence. The only two nations that haven't yet been conquered are Islam and America, they are next on the list to be destroyed by war. Sorry to depress you, but if we are to be realistic, then no one can stop them, in a matter of decades they will conquer and ensalve the world, there is no way to stop them.

If you have the time I recommend the following books, they will open your eyes even wider.

Tragedy and Hope by Caroll Quigley

The Grand Chessboard by Zbigniew Brzezinski

The Conquest of the World by the Jews by Major Osman Bey


Also the following short essay by Mark Twain is helpful,

http://classiclit.about.com/library/bl- ... ngjews.htm


If you prefer to listen rather than read, you can make your own audiobooks by using the following program.

http://www.neospeech.com/products.aspx

Just find the text, and convert it to audio using the Julie engine, you will get a very realistic and clear to hear audiobook.


Page 1 of 1     

Hedeyatprapto Imam, Imamat then who is present Imam on successions from Wahabi faith


Wahhabism is a man made religion

Wahhabism is a man made religion

Discussion in 'Seniors Cafe' started by fatman17, May 27, 2015.

  1. fatman17

    fatman17 PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    20,656
    Ratings:
    +31 / 20,699 / -1
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    WAHHABISM IS A MAN MADE RELIGION

    The Dönmeh: The Middle East’s Most Whispered Secret (Part I)

    Wayne MADSEN | 25.10.2011 | 20:39

    There is a historical “eight hundred pound gorilla” lurking in the background of almost every serious military and diplomatic incident involving Israel, Turkey, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Greece, Armenia, the Kurds, the Assyrians, and some other players in the Middle East and southeastern Europe. It is a factor that is generally only whispered about at diplomatic receptions, news conferences, and think tank sessions due to the explosiveness and controversial nature of the subject. And it is the secretiveness attached to the subject that has been the reason for so much misunderstanding about the current breakdown in relations between Israel and Turkey, a growing warming of relations between Israel and Saudi Arabia, and increasing enmity between Saudi Arabia and Iran…

    Although known to historians and religious experts, the centuries-old political and economic influence of a group known in Turkish as the “Dönmeh” is only beginning to cross the lips of Turks, Arabs, and Israelis who have been reluctant to discuss the presence in Turkey and elsewhere of a sect of Turks descended from a group of Sephardic Jews who were expelled from Spain during the Spanish Inquisition in the 16th and 17th centuries. These Jewish refugees from Spain were welcomed to settle in the Ottoman Empire and over the years they converted to a mystical sect of Islam that eventually mixed Jewish Kabbala and Islamic Sufi semi-mystical beliefs into a sect that eventually championed secularism in post-Ottoman Turkey. It is interesting that “Dönmeh” not only refers to the Jewish “untrustworthy converts” to Islam in Turkey but it is also a derogatory Turkish word for a transvestite, or someone who is claiming to be someone they are not.

    The Donmeh sect of Judaism was founded in the 17th century by Rabbi Sabbatai Zevi, a Kabbalist who believed he was the Messiah but was forced to convert to Islam by Sultan Mehmet IV, the Ottoman ruler. Many of the rabbi’s followers, known as Sabbateans, but also “crypto-Jews,” publicly proclaimed their Islamic faith but secretly practiced their hybrid form of Judaism, which was unrecognized by mainstream Jewish rabbinical authorities. Because it was against their beliefs to marry outside their sect, the Dönmeh created a rather secretive sub-societal clan.

    The Dönmeh rise to power in Turkey

    Many Dönmeh, along with traditional Jews, became powerful political and business leaders in Salonica. It was this core group of Dönmeh, which organized the secret Young Turks, also known as the Committee of Union and Progress, the secularists who deposed Ottoman Sultan Abdulhamid II in the 1908 revolution, proclaimed the post-Ottoman Republic of Turkey after World War I, and who instituted a campaign that stripped Turkey of much of its Islamic identity after the fall of the Ottomans. Abdulhamid II was vilified by the Young Turks as a tyrant, but his only real crime appears to have been to refuse to meet Zionist leader Theodore Herzl during a visit to Constantinople in 1901 and reject Zionist and Dönmeh offers of money in return for the Zionists to be granted control of Jerusalem.

    Like other leaders who have crossed the Zionists, Sultan Adulhamid II appears to have sealed his fate with the Dönmeh with this statement to his Ottoman court: “Advise Dr. Herzl not to take any further steps in his project. I cannot give away even a handful of the soil of this land for it is not my own, it belongs to the entire Islamic nation. The Islamic nation fought jihad for the sake of this land and had watered it with their blood. The Jews may keep their money and millions. If the Islamic Khalifate state is one day destroyed then they will be able to take Palestine without a price! But while I am alive, I would rather push a sword into my body than see the land of Palestine cut and given away from the Islamic state.” After his ouster by Ataturk’s Young Turk Dönmeh in 1908, Abdulhamid II was jailed in the Donmeh citadel of Salonica. He died in Constantinople in 1918, three years after Ibn Saud agreed to a Jewish homeland in Palestine and one year after Lord Balfour deeded Palestine away to the Zionists in his letter to Baron Rothschild.

    One of the Young Turk leaders in Salonica was Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, the founder of the Republic of Turkey. When Greece achieved sovereignty over Salonica in 1913, many Dönmeh, unsuccessful at being re-classified Jewish, moved to Constantinople, later re-named Istanbul. Others moved to Izmir, Bursa, and Ataturk’s newly-proclaimed capital and future seat of Ergenekon power, Ankara.

    Some texts suggest that the Dönmeh numbered no more than 150,000 and were mainly found in the army, government, and business. However, other experts suggest that the Dönmeh may have represented 1.5 million Turks and were even more powerful than believed by many and extended to every facet of Turkish life. One influential Donmeh, Tevfik Rustu Arak, was a close friend and adviser to Ataturk and served as Turkey’s Foreign Minister from 1925 to 1938.

    Ataturk, who was reportedly himself a Dönmeh, ordered that Turks abandon their own Muslim-Arabic names. The name of the first Christian emperor of Rome, Constantine, was erased from the largest Turkish city, Constantinople. The city became Istanbul, after the Ataturk government in 1923 objected to the traditional name. There have been many questions about Ataturk’s own name, since “Mustapha Kemal Ataturk” was a pseudonym. Some historians have suggested that Ataturk adopted his name because he was a descendant of none other than Rabbi Zevi, the self-proclaimed Messiah of the Dönmeh! Ataturk also abolished Turkey’s use of the Arabic script and forced the country to adopt the western alphabet.

    Modern Turkey: a secret Zionist state controlled by the Dönmeh

    Ataturk’s suspected strong Jewish roots, information about which was suppressed for decades by a Turkish government that forbade anything critical of the founder of modern Turkey, began bubbling to the surface, first, mostly outside of Turkey and in publications written by Jewish authors. The 1973 book, The Secret Jews, by Rabbi Joachim Prinz, maintains that Ataturk and his finance minister, Djavid Bey, were both committed Dönmeh and that they were in good company because “too many of the Young Turks in the newly formed revolutionary Cabinet prayed to Allah, but had their real prophet [Sabbatai Zevi, the Messiah of Smyrna].” In The Forward of January 28, 1994, Hillel Halkin wrote in The New York Sun that Ataturk recited the Jewish Shema Yisrael (“Hear O Israel”), saying that it was “my prayer too.” The information is recounted from an autobiography by journalist Itamar Ben-Avi, who claims Ataturk, then a young Turkish army captain, revealed he was Jewish in a Jerusalem hotel bar one rainy night during the winter of 1911. In addition, Ataturk attended the Semsi Effendi grade school in Salonica, run by a Dönmeh named Simon Zevi. Halkin wrote in the New York Sun article about an email he received from a Turkish colleague: “I now know – know (and I haven’t a shred of doubt) – that Ataturk’s father’s family was indeed of Jewish stock.”

    It was Ataturk’s and the Young Turks’ support for Zionism, the creation of a Jewish homeland in Palestine, after World War I and during Nazi rule in Europe that endeared Turkey to Israel and vice versa. An article in The Forward of May 8, 2007, revealed that Dönmeh dominated Turkish leadership “from the president down, as well as key diplomats . . . and a great part of Turkey’s military, cultural, academic, economic, and professional elites” kept Turkey out of a World War II alliance with Germany, and deprived Hitler of a Turkish route to the Baku oilfields.” In his book, The Donme: Jewish Converts, Muslim Revolutionaries and Secular Turks, Professor Marc David Baer wrote that many advanced to exalted positions in the Sufi religious orders.

    Israel has always been reluctant to describe the Turkish massacre of the Armenians by the Turks in 1915 as “genocide.” It has always been believed that the reason for Israel’s reticence was not to upset Israel’s close military and diplomatic ties with Turkey. However, more evidence is being uncovered that the Armenian genocide was largely the work of the Dönmeh leadership of the Young Turks. Historians like Ahmed Refik, who served as an intelligence officer in the Ottoman army, averred that it was the aim of the Young Turks to destroy the Armenians, who were mostly Christian. The Young Turks, under Ataturk’s direction, also expelled Greek Christians from Turkish cities and attempted to commit a smaller-scale genocide of the Assyrians, who were also mainly Christian.

    One Young Turk from Salonica, Mehmet Talat, was the official who carried out the genocide of the Armenians and Assyrians. A Venezuelan mercenary who served in the Ottoman army, Rafael de Nogales Mendez, noted in his annals of the Armenian genocide that Talat was known as the “renegade Hebrew of Salonica.” Talat was assassinated in Germany in 1921 by an Armenian whose entire family was lost in the genocide ordered by the “renegade Hebrew.” It is believed by some historians of the Armenian genocide that the Armenians, known as good businessmen, were targeted by the business-savvy Dönmeh because they were considered to be commercial competitors.

    It is not, therefore, the desire to protect the Israeli-Turkish alliance that has caused Israel to eschew any interest in pursuing the reasons behind the Armenian genocide, but Israel’s and the Dönmeh’s knowledge that it was the Dönmeh leadership of the Young Turks that not only murdered hundreds of thousands of Armenians and Assyrians but who also stamped out Turkey’s traditional Muslim customs and ways. Knowledge that it was Dönmeh, in a natural alliance with the Zionists of Europe, who were responsible for the deaths of Armenian and Assyrian Christians, expulsion from Turkey of Greek Orthodox Christians, and the cultural and religious eradication of Turkish Islamic traditions, would issue forth in the region a new reality. Rather than Greek and Turkish Cypriots living on a divided island, Armenians holding a vendetta against the Turks, and Greeks and Turks feuding over territory, all the peoples attacked by the Dönmeh would realize that they had a common foe that was their actual persecutor.

    Challenging Dönmeh rule: Turkey’s battle against the Ergenekon

    It is the purging of the Kemalist adherents of Ataturk and his secular Dönmeh regime that is behind the investigation of the Ergenekon conspiracy in Turkey. Ergenekon’s description matches up completely with the Dönmeh presence in Turkey’s diplomatic, military, judicial, religious, political, academic, business, and journalist hierarchy. Ergenekon attempted to stop the reforms instituted by successive non-Dönmeh Turkish leaders, including the re-introduction of traditional Turkish Islamic customs and rituals, by planning a series of coups, some successful like that which deposed Prime Minister Necmettin Erbakan’s Refah (Welfare) Islamist government in 1996 and some unsuccessful, like OPERATION SLEDGEHEMMER, which was aimed at deposing Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan in 2003. Some Islamist-leaning reformists, including Turkish President Turgut Ozal and Prime Minister Bulent Ecevit, died under suspicious circumstances. Deposed democratically-elected Prime Minister Adnan Menderes was hanged in 1961, following a military coup.

    American politicians and journalists, whose knowledge of the history of countries like Turkey and the preceding Ottoman Empire, is often severely lacking, have painted the friction between Israel’s government and the Turkish government of Prime Minister Erdogan as based on Turkey’s drift to Islamism and the Arab world. Far from it, Erdogan and his Justice and Development Party (AKP) seem to have finally seen a way to break free from the domination and cruelty of the Dönmeh, whether in the form of Kemalist followers of Ataturk or nationalist schemers and plotters in Ergenekon. But with Turkey’s “Independence Day” has come vitriol from the Dönmeh and their natural allies in Israel and the Israel Lobby in the United States and Europe. Turkey as a member of the European Union was fine for Europe as long as the Dönmeh remained in charge and permitted Turkey’s wealth to be looted by central bankers like has occurred in Greece.

    When Israel launched its bloody attack on the Turkish Gaza aid vessel, the Mavi Marmara, on May 31, 2010, the reason was not so much the ship’s running of the Israeli blockade of Gaza. The brutality of the Israelis in shooting unarmed Turks and one Turkish-American, some at point blank range, according to a UN report, indicated that Israel was motivated by something else: vengeance and retaliation for the Turkish government’s crackdown on Ergenekon, the purging of the Turkish military and intelligence senior ranks of Dönmeh, and reversing the anti-Muslim religious and cultural policies set down by the Dönmeh’s favorite son, Ataturk, some ninety years before. In effect, the Israeli attack on the Mavi Marmara was in retaliation for Turkey’s jailing of several top Turkish military officers, journalists, and academics, all accused of being part of the Ergenekon plot to overthrow the AKP government in 2003. Hidden in the Ergenekon coup plot is that the Dönmeh and Ergenekon are connected through their history of being Kemalists, ardent secularists, pro-Israeli, and pro-Zionist.

    With tempers now flaring between Iran on one side and Israel, Saudi Arabia, and the United States on the other, as the result of a dubious claim by U.S. law enforcement that Iran was planning to carry out the assassination of the Saudi ambassador to the United States on American soil, the long-standing close, but secretive relationship between Israel and Saudi Arabia is coming to the forefront. The Israeli-Saudi connection had flourished during OPERATION DESERT STORM, when both countries were on the receiving end of Saddam Hussein’s Scud missiles.


    What will surprise those who may already be surprised about the Dönmeh connection to Turkey, is the Dönmeh connection to the House of Saud in Saudi Arabia.

    An Iraqi Mukhabarat (General Military Intelligence Directorate) Top Secret report, “The Emergence of Wahhabism and its Historical Roots,” dated September 2002 and released on March 13, 2008, by the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency in translated English form, points to the Dönmeh roots of the founder of the Saudi Wahhabi sect of Islam, Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab. Much of the information is gleaned from the memoirs of a “Mr. Humfer,” (as spelled in the DIA report, “Mr. Hempher” as spelled the historical record) a British spy who used the name “Mohammad,” claimed to be an Azeri who spoke Turkish, Persian, and Arabic and who made contact with Wahhab in the mid-18th century with a view of creating a sect of Islam that would eventually bring about an Arab revolt against the Ottomans and pave the way for the introduction of a Jewish state in Palestine. Humfer’s memoirs are recounted by the Ottoman writer and admiral Ayyub Sabri Pasha in his 1888 work, “The Beginning and Spreading of Wahhabism.”

    In his book, The Dönmeh Jews, D. Mustafa Turan writes that Wahhab’s grandfather, Tjen Sulayman, was actually Tjen Shulman, a member of the Jewish community of Basra, Iraq. The Iraqi intelligence report also states that in his book, The Dönmeh Jews and the Origin of the Saudi Wahhabis, Rifat Salim Kabar reveals that Shulman eventually settled in the Hejaz, in the village of al-Ayniyah what is now Saudi Arabia, where his grandson founded the Wahhabi sect of Islam. The Iraqi intelligence report states that Shulman had been banished from Damascus, Cairo, and Mecca for his “quackery.” In the village, Shulman sired Abdul Wahhab. Abdel Wahhab’s son, Muhammad, founded modern Wahhabism.

    The Iraqi report also makes some astounding claims about the Saud family. It cites Abdul Wahhab Ibrahim al-Shammari’s book, The Wahhabi Movement: The Truth and Roots, which states that King Abdul Aziz Ibn Saud, the first Kingdom of Saudi Arabia monarch, was descended from Mordechai bin Ibrahim bin Moishe, a Jewish merchant also from Basra. In Nejd, Moishe joined the Aniza tribe and changed his name to Markhan bin Ibrahim bin Musa. Eventually, Mordechai married off his son, Jack Dan, who became Al-Qarn, to a woman from the Anzah tribe of the Nejd. From this union, the future Saud family was born.

    The Iraqi intelligence document reveals that the researcher Mohammad Sakher was the subject of a Saudi contract murder hit for his examination into the Sauds’ Jewish roots. In Said Nasir’s book, The History of the Saud Family, it is maintained that in 1943, the Saudi ambassador to Egypt, Abdullah bin Ibrahim al Muffadal, paid Muhammad al Tamami to forge a family tree showing that the Sauds and Wahhabs were one family that descended directly from the Prophet Mohammed.

    At the outset of World War I, a Jewish British officer from India, David Shakespeare, met with Ibn Saud in Riyadh and later led a Saudi army that defeated a tribe opposed to Ibn Saud. In 1915, Ibn Saud met with the British envoy to the Gulf region, Bracey Cocas. Cocas made the following offer to Ibn Saud: “I think this is a guarantee for your endurance as it is in the interest of Britain that the Jews have a homeland and existence, and Britain’s interests are, by all means, in your interest.” Ibn Saud, the descendant of Dönmeh from Basra, responded: “Yes, if my acknowledgement means so much to you, I acknowledge thousand times granting a homeland to the Jews in Palestine or other than Palestine.” Two years later, British Foreign Secretary Lord Balfour, in a letter to Baron Walter Rothschild, a leader of the British Zionists, stated: “His Majesty’s government view with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people . . .” The deal had the tacit backing of two of the major players in the region, both descendant from Dönmeh Jews who supported the Zionist cause, Kemal Ataturk and Ibn Saud. The present situation in the Middle East should be seen in this light but the history of the region has been purged by certain religious and political interests for obvious reasons.

    After World War I, the British facilitated the coming to power of the Saud regime in the former Hejaz and Nejd provinces of the Ottoman Empire. The Sauds established Wahhabism as the state religion of the new Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and, like the Kemalist Dönmeh in Turkey, began to move against other Islamic beliefs and sects, including the Sunnis and Shi’as. The Wahhabi Sauds accomplished what the Kemalist Dönmeh were able to achieve in Turkey: a fractured Middle East that was ripe for Western imperialistic designs and laid the groundwork for the creation of the Zionist state of Israel.

    Deep states and Dönmeh

    During two visits to Turkey in 2010, I had the opportunity of discussing the Ergenekon “deep state” with leading Turkish officials. It was more than evident that discussions about the Ergenekon network and its “foreign” connections are a highly-sensitive subject. However, it was also whispered by one high-ranking Turkish foreign policy official that there were other “deep states” in surrounding nations and Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Syria were mentioned by name. Considering the links between Ergenekon and the Dönmeh in Turkey and the close intelligence and military links between the Dönmeh-descendent Sauds and Wahhabis in Arabia, the reports of close links between ousted Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak and his intelligence chief Omar Suleiman and the Binyamin Netanyahu government in Israel may be seen in an entirely new light… And it would explain Erdogan’s support for Egypt’s revolution: in Turkey, it was a democratic revolution that curbed the influence of the Dönmeh. The influence of Wahhabi Salafists in Libya’s new government also explains why Erdogan was keen on establishing relations with the Benghazi-based rebels to help supplant the influence of the Wahhabis, the natural allies of his enemies, the Dönmeh (Ergenekon) of Turkey.

    Erdogan’s desire to set the historical record straight by restoring history purged by the Kemalists and Dönmeh has earned him vitriolic statements from Israel’s government that he is a neo-Ottomanist who is intent on forming an alliance with the Muslim Brotherhood in the Arab countries. Clearly, the Dönmeh and their Zionist brethren in Israel and elsewhere are worried about Dönmeh and Zionist historical revisionism, including their role in the Armenian and Assyrian genocide, and their genocide denial being exposed.

    In Egypt, which was once an Ottoman realm, it was a popular revolution that tossed out what may have amounted to the Dönmeh with regard to the Mubarak regime. The Egyptian “Arab Spring” also explains why the Israelis were quick to kill six Egyptian border police so soon after nine Turkish passengers were killed aboard the Mavi Marmara, some in execution style, by Israeli troops. Dönmeh doctrine is rife with references to the Old Testament Amalekites, a nomadic tribe ordered attacked by the Hebrews from Egypt by the Jewish God to make room for Moses’s followers in the southern region of Palestine. In the Book of Judges, God unsuccessfully commands Saul: “Now go and strike Amalek and devote to destruction all that they have. Do not spare them, but kill both man and woman, and infant, ox, and sheep, camel and donkey.” The Dönmeh, whose doctrine is also present in Hasidic and other orthodox sects of Judaism, appear to have no problem substituting the Armenians, Assyrians, Turks, Kurds, Egyptians, Iraqis, Lebanese, Iranians, and Palestinians for the Amalekites in carrying out their military assaults and pogroms.

    With reformist governments in Turkey and Egypt much more willing to look into the background of those who have split the Islamic world, Ataturk in Turkey and Mubarak in Egypt, the Sauds are likely very much aware that it is only a matter of time before their links, both modern and historical, to Israel will be fully exposed. It makes sense that the Sauds have been successful in engineering a dubious plot involving Iranian government agents trying to assassinate the Saudi ambassador to Washington in an unnamed Washington, DC restaurant. The Iraqi intelligence report could have been referring to the Zionists and Dönmeh when it stated, “it strives to . . . [the] killing of Muslims, destructing, and promoting the turmoil.” In fact, the Iraqi intelligence report was referring to the Wahhabis.

    With new freedom in Turkey and Egypt to examine their pasts, there is more reason for Israel and its supporters, as well as the Sauds, to suppress the true histories of the Ottoman Empire, secular Turkey, the origins of Israel, and the House of Saud. With various players now angling for war with Iran, the true history of the Dönmeh and their influence on past and current events in the Middle East becomes more important.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 8
    • Positive Rating Positive Rating x 1
  2. Zarvan

    Zarvan ELITE MEMBER

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2011
    Messages:
    26,880
    Ratings:
    +55 / 21,815 / -13
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    The joker who has written this should read main work of Muhammad bin Abdul Wahab and point out one thing which is not according to Quran and Sunnah as a matter of fact he has quoted only Quran and Sunnah in that books these jokers in their bias are full of lies and their ignorance is of epic proportions.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 8
  3. Gibbs

    Gibbs SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2013
    Messages:
    3,710
    Ratings:
    +6 / 4,451 / -1
    Country:
    Australia
    Location:
    Australia
    All religions are man made..
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 27
    Last edited: May 27, 2015
  4. Color_Less_Sky

    Color_Less_Sky SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2014
    Messages:
    3,242
    Ratings:
    +0 / 2,775 / -1
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Lengthy but interesting read.

    And guess what our own kommando boy Mushy's ideal was Kamal Ataturk and he also wished cordial relations with Israel. :azn:
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  5. Color_Less_Sky

    Color_Less_Sky SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2014
    Messages:
    3,242
    Ratings:
    +0 / 2,775 / -1
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Whatever you say fall of Sauds is imminent INSHALLAH. And just for the sake of reference, Jews in Prophet's time were some what similar. And if I remember correctly the ones who tried to reach and dig a tunnel to Prophet's grave were also some jews disguised as the most pious Muslims who would not leave their hujra and preaching people was their only concern.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 3
  6. hinduguy

    hinduguy ELITE MEMBER

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2011
    Messages:
    18,059
    Ratings:
    +5 / 17,851 / -5
    Country:
    India
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    OP please provide the link to original article.
     
  7. ghoul

    ghoul BANNED

    Joined:
    May 3, 2014
    Messages:
    2,279
    Ratings:
    +4 / 1,943 / -10
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Australia
    He called Prophet(SAW) a dead man, when we are not even allowed to call martyrs dead.

    Wahaabism along with Deobandism(Tableeghi Jamaat specially) is made in England. They dug up Ibn-Tahmiyah, a heretic from some lost pages of history, and made him someone important again. The English mission was to raise up ethno-religious fanatics to attack Ottoman Empire, which was the only Muslim state at that time capable of fighting and resisting Europeans. Ottomans were purely Sufi, and if they existed today, they would be labelled "barelvi" by the deobandis of Pakistan. The Mughals were also "barelvi", which is a fake term invented by deobandis and their English allies for the original Islam of sub-continent.

    The wahaabis and deobandis, who are 90% similar in their beliefs, are still acting in the favour of west in the forms of Islamic states and TTPs.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 8
  8. Color_Less_Sky

    Color_Less_Sky SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2014
    Messages:
    3,242
    Ratings:
    +0 / 2,775 / -1
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    And Janati totaaz with green turban trademark have specifically written on them "Made In Pakistan" and "For Pakistan Only". WTF.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2
  9. ghoul

    ghoul BANNED

    Joined:
    May 3, 2014
    Messages:
    2,279
    Ratings:
    +4 / 1,943 / -10
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Australia
    Green turbans and caps are worn by the Sufistic Islamic sects throughout the world. The green colour is a homage to Al-Khidr, who is a figure Sufis look up to. Green caps are worn by Albanians, Uighurs, Somalis, Chechens, Iraqis etc etc. The colour green is particularly emphasized by the Naqshbandi sect of Sufis. But for Pakistanis, the colour green only implies a parrot, showing the mental calibre of most people there.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 3
  10. Color_Less_Sky

    Color_Less_Sky SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2014
    Messages:
    3,242
    Ratings:
    +0 / 2,775 / -1
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Its not the mental caliber of Pakistanis, those are the actions of those Janati Tootaaz that speak a lot about green turbans in Pakistan, worst of the husbands I have ever seen, most illogical fools, easy to get frustrated, want everyone to celebrate milad, extremists in their mindsets, liars, and takfiris. Mayray Piyary Piyary meethay meethay Islami Bahio issi batt pay anghotay chomo aur apny muh pay phair lo.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 3
  11. Hyperion

    Hyperion PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2012
    Messages:
    11,150
    Ratings:
    +17 / 34,948 / -0
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Turkey
    Good post - already knew everything in the article since childhood, however, it's great that people such as @Zarvan (and of similar mindset) get a chance to understand that they are actually not Muslims and follow a mad-mans version of Islam.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2
  12. ghoul

    ghoul BANNED

    Joined:
    May 3, 2014
    Messages:
    2,279
    Ratings:
    +4 / 1,943 / -10
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Australia
    Sweeping generalizations. What about your deoband mullahs with "manhoosat"(evil taint) on their faces. Like these "ulma" of yours for example:
    [​IMG]

    Worst husbands?Are you nuts, sir or madame? Also tell me on thing, why are most of your ulma fat and drive suvs. Is chanday ka paisa used to fuel their suvs and pot bellies?
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 4
  13. Color_Less_Sky

    Color_Less_Sky SENIOR MEMBER

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2014
    Messages:
    3,242
    Ratings:
    +0 / 2,775 / -1
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Point out one Tableeghi from them ................................. come on point out which one is a prominent Tableeghi jamat member in this photo?

    I have no love for anyone of them those in pic except for the guy at three from left. The rest I don't even know their names so I don't know how they are my Ulema. And how would I know about their bellies and Suvs.

    And yes janati tootaaz green turban are an extremist mindset which will label anyone who disagrees with what they believe a deemed kafir or Abu Jahil. Mumtaz Qadri is a bralevi or not?
     
  14. Zarvan

    Zarvan ELITE MEMBER

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2011
    Messages:
    26,880
    Ratings:
    +55 / 21,815 / -13
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Hazrat ABU BAKAR RA used the term when Hazrat UMAR RA refused to accept that PROPHET SAW has died go read the speech of HAZRAT ABU BAKAR all other stuff you stand is false bullshi* based on bias go read his main work Kitab ut Tawhid than come and debate with me
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  15. Zarvan

    Zarvan ELITE MEMBER

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2011
    Messages:
    26,880
    Ratings:
    +55 / 21,815 / -13
    Country:
    Pakistan
    Location:
    Pakistan
    Salafism is far older than Saudis and instead of talking non sense go read Kitab ut Tawhid than come and talk to me
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1